Talk:Storage: LVM: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(No mention of FC storage) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
But here you did not mention '''FC''' storage at all. | But here you did not mention '''FC''' storage at all. | ||
Maybe also to note the reference document related to '''Multipath''': | |||
* '''LVM''' on top Multipath + iSCSI | |||
* '''LVM''' on top Multipath + FC | |||
https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Multipath | |||
So please correct this. | |||
Revision as of 07:34, 4 February 2025
Under Section:
https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Storage
You have noted: 3: It is possible to use LVM on top of an iSCSI or FC-based storage. That way you get a shared LVM storage
But here you did not mention FC storage at all.
Maybe also to note the reference document related to Multipath:
- LVM on top Multipath + iSCSI
- LVM on top Multipath + FC
https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Multipath
So please correct this.