[pve-devel] qm migrate : do we really need a -online option ?

Rob wylde wylde780 at gmail.com
Fri Aug 24 19:47:43 CEST 2012


Perhaps this could also be part of a global configuration ?

On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Michael Rasmussen <mir at datanom.net> wrote:

> Sorry, should have been sent to the list.
>
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 15:40:33 +0000
> Dietmar Maurer <dietmar at proxmox.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Well, I tried to provide the same options as openvz.
> >
> Maybe its just me that is confused, but:
> 1) A running CT can only be migrated using online migration?
> 2) A CT not running will use offline migration?
>
> So what is point of give the user a choice when the choice is given? (A
> quote from Henry Ford: The customer can choose any color he likes as
> long as i chooses black)
>
>
> --
> Hilsen/Regards
> Michael Rasmussen
>
> Get my public GnuPG keys:
> michael <at> rasmussen <dot> cc
> http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD3C9A00E
> mir <at> datanom <dot> net
> http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE501F51C
> mir <at> miras <dot> org
> http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE3E80917
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> pve-devel mailing list
> pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com
> http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://pve.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/attachments/20120824/871c1669/attachment.html>


More information about the pve-devel mailing list