[pve-devel] new bridge code doesn't work with redhat kernel

[Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG]

Hi,
Am 08.02.2013 08:15, schrieb Alexandre DERUMIER:
>>> Like uPNP on firewalls? Now I really gets scared! 
> 
> Hopefully, it's the switch which do the gvrp request ;)
> So the security is on the switch side and not proxmox.
> 
> It's just that currently, proxmox doesn't respond to gvrp request.
> 
> Gvrp can be usefull if you have a big number of vlan to manage and a big number of switch, as it can configure your whole switch chain/trunk.
> But I'm always afraid of setting a wrong vlan in proxmox,like allow critical admin vlan to customers, so I don't use it ;)

I heavily depends on your use case. In our case we have no customers
which have access to the VM and GVRP works great.

Stefan