[pve-devel] perhaps a bug in QemuConfig.pm?

Dietmar Maurer dietmar at proxmox.com
Tue Jun 6 17:12:45 CEST 2017


> I was referring to the extra "snapshot" of the state which for remote 
> storage means the requirements for an extra LUN which is limiting things 
> when number of LUN's are sparse as it is with FreeNAS (Max 25 LUN's for 
> each VM).

IMHO, this is simply not suitable for a virtualization storage backend. 
And I don't want to limit the functionality of our software only because 
there are some outdated storage boxes around.

Or what was the suggestion exactly?




More information about the pve-devel mailing list