[PVE-User] NIC - Bond

Tonči Stipičević tonci at suma-informatika.hr
Thu Jan 24 22:45:26 CET 2013


Hello Everybody

I would like to achieve better performance by teaming NICs on the host.

Are two
PWLA8391GTLBLK
INTEL Network Card PRO/1000 GT (10/100/1000Base-T, 1000Mbps, Bulk, 
Gigabit Ethernet, lowprofile PCI)  NICs
good enough to be bond in order to get higher performance ?   Switch and 
NAS will also berunning trunked NICs

What NICs are recommended for teaming in proxmox ?

thank you very much in advance and

/
/
/srdačan pozdrav / best regards/

Tonči Stipičević
/direktor / manager/**
**
	


d.o.o.
ltd.
	
*podrška / upravljanje
**IT*/ sustavima za male i srednje tvrtke/

/Small & Medium Business
/*IT*//*support / management*
	
Badalićeva 27 / 10000 Zagreb / Hrvatska – Croatia
url: www.suma-informatika.hr
mob: +385 91 1234003
fax: +385 1  5560007



On 24.01.2013 12:00, pve-user-request at pve.proxmox.com wrote:
> Send pve-user mailing list submissions to
> 	pve-user at pve.proxmox.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	pve-user-request at pve.proxmox.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	pve-user-owner at pve.proxmox.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of pve-user digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>     1. LVM snapshot && VSS (into VM) (dea)
>     2. Re: LVM snapshot && VSS (into VM) (Dietmar Maurer)
>     3. Re: LVM snapshot && VSS (into VM) (dea)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 09:32:47 +0100
> From: "dea" <dea at corep.it>
> To: pve-user at pve.proxmox.com
> Subject: [PVE-User] LVM snapshot && VSS (into VM)
> Message-ID: <20130124082051.M29122 at corep.it>
> Content-Type: text/plain;	charset=utf-8
>
>
> Hello all !
>
> I use LVM snapshot to backup, freeze and revert VM (each VM has its LVM on SAN).
> But....
>
> LVM snapshot freeze the VM at a specific time but into the VM the FS is not
> consistent.
> I know the modern FS use journal.. and a simple fsck solves the problem.
> But... db or ms exchange do not like this treatment.
> I can activate VSS into MS VM before create LVM snapshot ? Or can I set the VM
> in stable state before activate it ?
>
> The only (stable) solution I found is to shutdow the VM server, create the
> snapshot LVM and immediately start it. OK, but it isn't the best solution.
>
> Any idea ?
>
> Very thanks
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 09:53:05 +0000
> From: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar at proxmox.com>
> To: dea <dea at corep.it>, "pve-user at pve.proxmox.com"
> 	<pve-user at pve.proxmox.com>
> Subject: Re: [PVE-User] LVM snapshot && VSS (into VM)
> Message-ID:
> 	<24E144B8C0207547AD09C467A8259F75579970F6 at lisa.maurer-it.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>> I use LVM snapshot to backup, freeze and revert VM (each VM has its LVM
>> on SAN).
>> But....
>>
>> LVM snapshot freeze the VM at a specific time but into the VM the FS is not
>> consistent.
>> I know the modern FS use journal.. and a simple fsck solves the problem.
>> But... db or ms exchange do not like this treatment.
> Any reasonable database use transactions, so that is not really  a problem.
>
>> I can activate VSS into MS VM before create LVM snapshot ? Or can I set the
>> VM in stable state before activate it ?
> We currently do not have a guest agent, so that is not possible. But this is a planned feature.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 10:55:12 +0100
> From: "dea" <dea at corep.it>
> To: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar at proxmox.com>,	"pve-user at pve.proxmox.com"
> 	<pve-user at pve.proxmox.com>
> Subject: Re: [PVE-User] LVM snapshot && VSS (into VM)
> Message-ID: <20130124095442.M33423 at corep.it>
> Content-Type: text/plain;	charset=utf-8
>
>
>> We currently do not have a guest agent, so that is not possible. But
>> this is a planned feature.
> Perfect !!!
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> pve-user mailing list
> pve-user at pve.proxmox.com
> http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
>
>
> End of pve-user Digest, Vol 58, Issue 18
> ****************************************

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/attachments/20130124/b8d0fcbb/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 7689 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/attachments/20130124/b8d0fcbb/attachment.png>


More information about the pve-user mailing list