[PVE-User] pve-firewall 2.0-31 broken on upgrade?

[Chris Murray]

On 18/10/2016 05:26, Dietmar Maurer wrote:
>> Sure enough, I can't find an LXC.pm
> Seems your installation is broken. Try to fix that with
>
> # apt-get update
> # apt-get dist-upgrade
>
Good morning Dietmar,

I've tried that, and it's still unhappy:

Calculating upgrade... The following packages were automatically 
installed and are no longer required:
   apparmor btrfs-tools ceph-fs-common ceph-fuse criu cryptsetup-bin 
libapparmor-perl libapparmor1 libasn1-8-heimdal libbabeltrace-ctf1 
libbabeltrace1
   libboost-program-options1.49.0 libboost-program-options1.55.0 
libboost-regex1.55.0 libcephfs1 libelf1 libfcgi0ldbl libgnutlsxx28 
libgssapi3-heimdal
   libhcrypto4-heimdal libheimbase1-heimdal libheimntlm0-heimdal 
libhx509-5-heimdal libjemalloc1 libjs-jquery libkrb5-26-heimdal 
libleveldb1 libprotobuf-c1
   libprotobuf9 libpve-storage-perl librados2-perl libroken18-heimdal 
libseccomp2 libwind0-heimdal lxc-pve lxcfs netcat6 pve-docs 
python-blinker python-cephfs
   python-flask python-ipaddr python-itsdangerous python-jinja2 
python-markupsafe python-protobuf python-pyinotify python-werkzeug 
smartmontools uidmap
   xfsprogs
Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them.
Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
1 not fully installed or removed.
After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y
Setting up pve-firewall (2.0-31) ...
Job for pve-firewall.service failed. See 'systemctl status 
pve-firewall.service' and 'journalctl -xn' for details.
dpkg: error processing package pve-firewall (--configure):
  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
  pve-firewall


Interestingly, though, I'd just tried the same on another node of the 
'test cluster' (it's just three VMs which live inside another Proxmox 
cluster), and that worked fine. Could this be something which has been 
recified in the repositories between the first two problematic attempts 
and the third successful one? (Cluster #1, Node #1 fail) .. (Cluster #2, 
Node #1 fail) .. problem fixed? .. (Cluster #2, Node #2 success)

I'm reluctant to try another node on Cluster #1 because it's rendered 
the Ceph MON and OSDs on that node unusable.